Original ExistDifferently.com Weblog of David, a Christian Network and Systems Manager, with topics ranging from Apologetics to Worldview, and some crypto, open source, programming, opinion, and daily life thrown in between.

Tue, 2005-03-22 (Mar 22)

Kill Your Baby?

Filed under: Blog,Funny,General,In The News — David @ 12:49

That’s right. Fox 59, your friendly local Indy news station, recommends you at least subject your kid to danger if you don’t buy a brand new crib! While searching for something else (Did you know some people have taken pictures of “every Starbucks in the city”:http://www.starbuckseverywhere.net/Indianapolis.htm and posted them online? This one “next to my bank”:http://home.flash.net/~ral1/starbucks/bigimages/DSCN8511.htm (they’re connected inside! You can smell the coffee while you make a deposit, I suppose so you can then use your debit card to spend your deposit on the spot :-) has a sign out front that I hope isn’t keeping people away!), an “archive from April 2004”:http://fox59.trb.com/news/local/morningnews/wxin-am-fyi-april.story says, in part (emphasis mine):

Tuesday, April 13
CRIB SAFETY PRECAUTION
A crib can cost more than $3,000. But a hefty price tag doesn’t always mean more safety for your baby. Consumer Reports tested more than a dozen cribs to find out which ones are the best. Prices ranged from $100 to $500. Experts say simpler designs are safer. “Fancy decorations can catch a child’s clothing at the neck and that’s a potential strangulation hazard”, says Consumer Reports Sandra Gordon. The Delta Luv Jenny Lind model #4650-1 is easy to assemble and at only $110 its a Consumer Reports best buy. If you decide to use an older crib instead of buying a new one, make sure it was made before 1999. Experts say cribs made before that are not as safe.

Did they really mean that? Well, probably not as much as Wal-Mart meant that interesting price, uh, “reduction” I mentioned a while ago :-)

I never want my blog accused of sensationalizing trivia, so don’t accuse me. Whether I do it or not. Okay? ;-) (If you need to accuse me of something, you could point out my overuse of smileys :-p Or…how about my (usually (sometimes) nested) use of parentheses? I mean, you’ve got a nice example of both right here! Can! You! Spot! Another! Problem!? Not so much in this post (other than the last five sentence fragments), but overall my exclamation point useage patter tends to trend toward the upward side of the curve :-) And that’s even after I try to curb my enthusiasm! (Hey, that’s almost the name of a show on HBO! I don’t get that channel so I’ve just heard the name.)

Wed, 2005-03-16 (Mar 16)

Life Is Good

Filed under: Blog,Books,Christianity,General,Personal — David @ 00:53

Yep, life is good. Bears repeating. My Utmost for His Highest by Oswald Chambers is a good book. So is Secrets of the Secret Place by Bob Sorge. I’m not even going to give you links to them, because you can find them at Amazon yourself just fine. Actually, it’s becuase I’ve got better things than to find the links to them right now. And I’m feeling lazy. But I’d appreciate you buying them through a search using this box if you wouldn’t mind:

Amazon Logo

Search Now:

Give’s me a tiny kickback and costs you nothing but searching from this page (or using the links to Amazon for other books in my older posts). Thanks.

Anyway, just started those books. Gotta move slowly in them, quite a bit of info.

Still no pics of new car up, but that’s due to, well, the whole lazy thing. Plus a lot going on now. I don’t really feel like spending the time to type out those things that I don’t mind saying publicly, and, well, the other things wouldn’t end up here anyway :-) Librarygal mentioned that’s why she uses Friends mode to post more sensitive, not-quite-public posts, in Live Journal. Blah. Blasted features community sites implement that I don’t feel like adding or upgrading or developing my own community on my server directly at the moment. So I’ll live without it I guess. Public only. When I have time.

But, remember, life is good! Which it is. There will never be a time when it couldn’t be better here on earth, and there are those things that I’d rather were different at the moment. But they are looking up compared to, for example, a month ago (not that I remember what was going on a month ago…), just in general.

Maturing is good. Maturity is only a state we think we’ve reached when we don’t realize we’re still on the journey. The never-ending process of maturing, however, basically means growing and learning (in my opinion…no dictionary was harmed or consulted in the defining of the term): from circumstances, thoughts, feelings, experiences, friends, books, chats, talks, conversation, movies, literature, family, God. And making yourself better by experiencing these things. “But grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.” says 2 Peter 3:18, KJV. That’s how we mature.

Don’t fret or worry. Instead of worrying, pray. Let petitions and praises shape your worries into prayers, letting God know your concerns. Before you know it, a sense of God’s wholeness, everything coming together for good, will come and settle you down. It’s wonderful what happens when Christ displaces worry at the center of your life.

Summing it all up, friends, I’d say you’ll do best by filling your minds and meditating on things true, noble, reputable, authentic, compelling, gracious–the best, not the worst; the beautiful, not the ugly; things to praise, not things to curse. Put into practice what you learned from me, what you heard and saw and realized. Do that, and God, who makes everything work together, will work you into his most excellent harmonies.
— Philippians 4:6-9 (The Message)

Good advice in all the translations/paraphrases, but I liked The Message at the moment, it’s different than the usual wording, giving it a fresh perspective. Stop reading. Start doing :-)

Tue, 2005-03-08 (Mar 08)

Communication Styles

Filed under: Blog,General,Personal — David @ 00:55

“Thinking Faster”:http://workingsmarter.typepad.com/, a blog I follow semi-regularly (it’s in my newsreader, I don’t read it as often as I should but I read over the homepage worth of posts and they’re all excellent at the moment! Stuff to get you thinking, can’t say whether I agree with it all but food for thought is normally good), has an interesting post called “Tools of the Trade“:http://workingsmarter.typepad.com/my_weblog/2005/02/tools_of_the_tr.html that mentions two people he knew, one that exclusively used email for communication, the other the phone.

I found it interesting, because I’m much more comfortable with email than a phone conversation. I dislike the phone and voicemail for most purposes; I’ll use it if I have to but I may procrastinate making a call, and I dislike voicemail. I always transcribe the pertinent details into a blank text document on the computer (sometimes on a piece of paper), delete the voicemail, and either reply by take care of a request, send a reply — by email — or add an Outlook Task entry for the item with the transcribed details as the body so I don’t forget and I have the phone number. Rarely do I actually return the call with another call, at least, if I can help it. Sometimes you can’t avoid it, or it will work better to just make the call.

I used to be able to avoid phone calls before I started working. When you work in a retail story, or at a desk in an office, it usually forces some phone time, and it’s been good for me. I’m much better on the phone than I used to be, but that doesn’t mean I actually like it!

Don’t get me wrong, I’m with everyone else in hating getting greeted by a computer menu when I’m trying to call tech support — or worse, a sales person! It’s not that I dislike not having to talk with a human, but it prolongs the phone time (it can take five minutes to communicate the same information a human could have taken and redirected my call with in five seconds — maybe ten), wasting my time and insulting my intelligence (yes, I typed 5……4……3……2…….1. A whole lot faster than you said it back to me, too! “Please listen carefully as our menu has changed.” Really? Since the last time I called five minutes ago and went through this whole thing before you disconnected me? If you’re putting that much effort into changing your menu that quickly, answer the phone already! Can you tell I’ve dealt with this recently? ;-)

So anyway, email me. If I’m at the computer and your email warrants a response I have the answer to right away, you’ll probably get it as fast as I can type it. If you call me, you’re probably interrupting something so I’ll have to be short and probably call you back anyway, so as not to be rude with the person I’m already with, or so I can finish up what I was in the middle of so I can focus on you. Email gives me that chance, even if you email me asking me to call you! I’m more likely to return that request (and remember to!) if it can’t just go in one ear and out the other, since email doesn’t just go away.

This post was supposed to be a paragraph or two. Yikes, it’s turning into an email! (If you’d read any of my work emails over the past year (my second year of full-time at my current job started March 3rd!), you would likely see a pattern of really long emails switching into short(er) emails that clearly in plain english state the most important information first, with ancillary info down near the bottom where apparently no one in my office other than me gets to when reading an email. I modified my style after finding this last fact out, plus a few nice notices from boss & coworkers that shorter emails may actually be read :-)

Notice I don’t feel the same constraints in blog posts. But I do need to get to bed, got a busy week this week! My to-do list grew by leaps and bounds Monday, even though I got a lot done and checked off. And most of it is “must do this week” priority! Oh well, a lot of that gets knocked into next week every week, some stuff just doesn’t seem as important any more after you haven’t done it :-) Just kidding…it’s a matter of prioritizing as usual. Can’t get it all done, but I try. I’m just juggling a few major decisions that need testing to get to a conclusion and I have hard deadlines for some by the end of this week or we’ll be locked into thousands of dollars worth of spending. Hey, no pressure! :-)

How do I handle it? I call on the smart people for help! Nothing like someone who can say “been there, done that!”

On a goodnight sidenote, this essay called “The Tyranny of Email“:http://www.w-uh.com/articles/030308-tyranny_of_email.html that kicks off the above-mentioned article, is well-written and brings up some good points. I don’t agree with a lot of them, as you may pick up after reading my entry here. Or at least, I don’t know if I could bring myself to implement most of the suggestions, even if I wanted to. Yeah, that’s more accurate :-)

Actually, the follow-up post entitled “‘Tyranny’ Revisited“:http://www.w-uh.com/articles/030316-tyranny_revisited.html is even more useful, and agreeable, to me. Just one gem of the bunch:

Whenever you are not doing something which requires concentration, by all means, run your email client, run your IM client, have notifications turned on, take ‘phone calls, the works. But when you really need to get work done, turn everything off. Isolate yourself. Okay, enough about that.

The layout of a workday, under the heading “Three Hours?”, is interesting, but I agree, purely theoretical.

And if you’re still with me, the post “I am an Iterator“:http://www.w-uh.com/posts/030315a-iterator.html at the same site is interesting to think about. I probably fit that profile on some things, for a set period of time until I lose interest. Until then, I tend to follow that pattern of redoing things to get closer to perfection, but in a very, very limited capacity. And rarely in my writing, as I hate, hate, hate editing! I can probably count on my fingers the times I’ve really gone back and edited something I’ve written for more than surface spelling errors and maybe a bit of basic grammar. Hope you can’t tell too much :-)

Sun, 2005-03-06 (Mar 06)

Rules of Thumb

Filed under: Blog,Books,Entertainment,Movies — David @ 22:35

Maybe if I try shorter posts about things I find and stuff, rather than trying to write an essay on everything, I’d get more posted. I’ve found tons of awesome stuff since my last post, but I usually am on to reading the next cool thing before I get around to posting! I’ve been so busy with life, too…I suppose that’s as good a reason as any to be absent from my blog, being the introvert I am.

Anyway, good post over at 43 Folders about an old book he found in his closet, with quotes! They’re all “Rules of Thumb“:http://www.43folders.com/2005/03/rules_of_thumb_.html and I like his favorites! I’m trying to hold myself back from reserving the books at the library, I have too many out already! I’m having to return them without reading them as people put them on hold.

Right now in fact I’m listening to the first audiobook I’ve listened to in years. I figured if I can’t read in the car (while driving to work), and I don’t feel like listening to music, why not listen to a book? Especially since I haven’t had time to listen to the myriad books that I just mentioned I have out from the library :-)

So, the book I’m listening to is “The Great Train Robbery“:http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0060502304/davidsworldva-20/002-2086300-3510456?%5Fencoding=UTF8&camp=2025&link%5Fcode=xm2 by Michael Crichton. It’s a true story and it’s very well told, at least from the first CD (the one I finished so far) of eight. Once I’m done, I think I’ll also watch the “DVD of the movie”:http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0792839064/davidsworldva-20/002-2086300-3510456?%5Fencoding=UTF8&camp=2025&link%5Fcode=xm2 from the book, made in 1979 and starring Sean Connery. My friend Shawn recommended both the book and the movie, along with “Michael Crichton’s other books”:http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/external-search?search-type=ss&tag=davidsworldva-20&keyword=Michael%20Crichton&index=books, some of which I already have from the library. Many are also movies.

While doing some Googling about The Great Train Robbery, I found another interesting “movie by the same name, made in 1903”:http://www.filmsite.org/grea.html! It’s not my genre (silent western) but apparently it set a lot of moviemaking milestones, according to the review at the link. They also released a 100th anniversary DVD version, it’s “at Amazon”:http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0000WN1JA/davidsworldva-20/002-2086300-3510456?%5Fencoding=UTF8&camp=2025&link%5Fcode=xm2 in case you’re more interested than I.

Haven’t gotten around to those pictures of my new car yet, but they’re coming eventually.

On a quick unrelated note, domain names ending in .us are apparently losing the ability to be registered privately through a proxy service such as the Private Registrations that “GoDaddy”:http://www.godaddy.com/ provides. GoDaddy’s owner provides a very good discussion of this “on his blog”:http://bobparsons.com/index.php?/archives/36-Domain-owners-lose-privacy.-Nine-ways-we-are-now-more-vulnerable..html. Good read.

I did mention I was trying to make these posts shorter, right? :-)

Fri, 2005-03-04 (Mar 04)

Got a New Car!

Filed under: Blog,Cars,General,Spectra — David @ 03:48

Not quite the budget for a Mazda6 yet. Apparently need some car-credit history to get a good deal on car-credit. You know, the usual. Ended up with a brand-new “2005 Kia Spectra SX”:http://www.kia.com/newspectra/index.php that’s silver (pics coming soon) and a step up from the other nicest car I’ve had, a 2000 Nissan Altima. This has good mileage, very nice body styling, and even though it’s a 4-cylinder 2.0L engine, it’s extremely peppy both at low speeds and on the highway. No mistaking it for a V6 (for sure!) but it will hold its own and outperforms my ’94 Chevy Blazer by leaps and bounds. Plus, I’ll be able to save up to $100/month if I refinance in six months to a year after making payments and building credit. If I make payments above the minimum, I won’t even be upside down for very long, and will hopefully have the Mazda6 in whatever new iteration it’s in at the time (or something better!) reasonably soon!

My Dad and I got home not long ago from the dealer…he was in Ft. Wayne (about an hour and a half to two hours away from home) because we didn’t leave there until half-past midnight! We got there around 5 pm, my Dad knows the guy that runs the dealership for Bob Rohrman, we went to dinner with him (I ate sushi for the first time! Not bad if you eat the kinds without raw fish!) and test-drove the car. I jammed my middle finger in the door when closing it after the test drive; I suppose the policy is “it breaks you (your finger), you buy it” :-)

It actually took me a long time to decide to go with it, but I got a great price and decent financing, and insurance isn’t that bad after working some details out. Dang you have to sign a lot of papers to buy a car! I think the paper-signing took 1.5 hours! Got a nice full tank of gas and even got 10 gallons of gas for my truck for free just for buying the car. Cool. Stupid stuff is $2.099 per gallon at the moment…the 12.5 gallons my new 13-gallon tank needed was $26.41, more than the $25.88 I spent the other day at $1.699/gallon to top off my Blazer, which only needed 14.882 gallons in it’s 20-gallon tank admittedly. But with the MPG(Miles Per Gallon) on the Spectra, with 24/34 city/highway miles per gallon (EPA average rating), it barely sips gas compared to the Blazer. Adding up to a Mazda6 faster! :-)

Need to hit the sack now, no work tomorrow morning but some new toys (car, networking equipment) to play with!

Fri, 2005-02-25 (Feb 25)

Mazda6 Test Drive

Filed under: Blog,Cars,General,Mazda 6 — David @ 00:58

Took the recommendation of a friend and checked out a used car broker in town. Awesome Christians and they also have the best mechanic I’ve ever met in my life! Ask me if you’re interested in the name of the dealer.

The guy (the owner of the dealership/brokerage) took me and my Dad to the car auction place in Plainfield where we basically got to drive around and look at all their cars, and we could look at and test drive anything we wanted to on their test track! (It’s a nice “track” for testing but it doesn’t quite compare to the racing kind.) Got to drive four different “Mazda6”:http://www.familycar.com/RoadTests/Mazda-6/ sedans. All essentially the same car, just different color/number of cylinders/trims. Here’s what they were (two were silver and two were black, but I keep confusing myself as to which were what color so I may be wrong here, but I think I remember…):

1. Black base trim 4-cylinder auto-transmission. This was nice, not too much different in feel than the Altima I had back in 2000.
2. Silver fully loaded V6 manual transmission. This thing just plain rocks! I didn’t get to drive it because I don’t know how to drive a stick shift (yet?). But the dealer drove me in it, and he, um, knows how to drag race cars :-) Very cool.
3. Black fully loaded 4-cylinder auto-transmission. Nice, felt like the manual V6 except for, well, the manual transmission and the V6! A little better accelleration than my Mom’s 2001 Infiniti G20 that her father gave her when he stopped driving last year (he’s in his mid-eighties), I could see myself with this one.
4. Best for last: Black, fully loaded V6 auto-transmission. I love this car. I want this car. Only problem? Should I get this or the silver stick shift with the same trim? I’m having a tough time deciding; making it harder is that the auto-tranny includes a nice little auto-manual-shifter feature over to the right of the Drive position (see “this photo”:http://photos2.ebizautos.com/1366/581667_29.jpg). But I didn’t realize that when I test-drove it, to see how it worked.

I’ve only driven a stick for one half-hour of my entire life. And that was an ’86 Ford Ranger tiny pickup truck that we had for a little while as an extra vehicle. First gear was kind of sticky, and I managed to kill the engine three times in that half-hour (well, it may have been more me than the sticky first gear, but even my parents had trouble with it sometimes. I don’t think they ever killed the engine though :-) But I think it might be fun to try a stick…only problem is, if I buy a car with a loan, and I get tired of driving a stick soon, I’m stuck for a while. But I think driving can be “boring” sometimes because it’s so simple (not that I don’t enjoy it!), so maybe a stick would make it more interesting. Then again, makes it a bit harder to use the cell phone and eat while driving! Six of one… :-)

Anyway, short post, need to get to bed. Nice “photo gallery”:http://www.familycar.com/RoadTests/Mazda-6/Photos.htm of the car here, including the Wagon and 5-Door (Hatchback) models I’m not looking at.

Oh yeah, “fully loaded” means, in addition to stuff I’m probably forgetting:

Leather heated seats, premium Bose audio, auto-climate control, power moonroof, 17″ wheels with Alloy rims, bucket seats, 4-wheel ABS, Traction control, remote alarm system, 8-way power driver’s seat, and the Sport Package with optional Spoiler (see the first link above near the bottom for more of a description along with a better format of this list). Not sure if the Sport Package was on all the fully loaded ones I drove, some had spoilers some didn’t, all fully loaded had the 8-way power driver’s seat at least and most of the rest.

I still have some research to do (and maybe a bit more test driving :-) and some financing things to work out, but I really like the Mazda6 V6, fully loaded with either the manual or automatic transmission (once I decide :-) and I hope everything works out for me to get one soon!

While I’m at it…think perhaps this laptop would go well with either of the Mazda (silver or black) colors? “Envy m:870”:http://www.voodoopc.com/sellPage.aspx?productID=1019. Why yes, yes it would. And, if I don’t buy a car, I could probably afford it soon…so that would be a NO :-)

Thu, 2005-02-24 (Feb 24)

A Post In 133 Words or Less

Filed under: Blog,Funny,General,Origins,Worldviews — David @ 00:36

Short made it they, so shall I: ” The History of the Universe in 200 Words or Less”:http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3fs8i/hist/hist.html

Keep in mind: I haven’t actually read the whole darn thing so I can’t vouch for accuracy. One mention of “Religion” I saw. Looks like it fit in 2,000 years ago, hard to tell. Of course I can’t vouch for the earlier: “Photosynthetic unicellular organisms. Oxidation. Mutation. Natural selection and evolution. Respiration. Cell differentiation. Sexual reproduction. Fossilization. Land exploration. Dinosaur extinction. Mammal expansion. Glaciation. Homo sapiens manifestation.”

But hey, anything that short’s bound to have some errors creep in there, I mean it takes so long to go back and check your work… :-)

Supposedly based on the book “A Briefer History of Time“:http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3fs8i/bhtes/ which, of course, I put on hold at the library! Looks humorous.

Sun, 2005-02-20 (Feb 20)

Spoonman

I really can’t say that I’ve ever seen any Anime beyond a minute or two of Pokemon here and there a while back. Can’t say I see myself getting into it. But, if you know me (and no, just reading this blog doesn’t count…IRL(In Real Life) is preferred…if you know me well enough you should figure it out pretty fast when you see it), you might figure out why this is hilarious!

Spoonman“:http://daveschool.com/spoonman/

I like it for the same reason I liked the main character (and his nickname) in “I, Robot“:http://www.irobotmovie.com/ (in addition to that just being a cool movie!).

Anyway. Past bedtime!

Oh yeah, but I do want one of those laptops they have at “Boxxtech”:http://www.boxxtech.com (I customized to the “one I want”:http://www.boxxtech.com/products/configurator.asp?ModelSeriesID=98, starts at $2,985.00 and it’s only $5,068.00 when I get done with it :-) Oh yeah, plus I also played with customizing their high-end desktop system. With nearly every add-on and high-end item I could add (actually I picked my favorites instead of the most costly option a few places) it went from a base of about $3,000 up to over $24,500!!!!! I can’t think of a comparison to my salary that wouldn’t reveal too much, but let’s say I’m not going to be able to afford that system on mine any time soon! Actually, the $3,000 one isn’t exactly in my budget, either…

Okay, now it’s bedtime :-)

Thu, 2005-02-17 (Feb 17)

Fry’s opening (almost) in town!

Filed under: General — David @ 03:32

Scanning through blogs (yes, more procrastination from last post!) and found my “Topix Local News”:http://www.topix.net/city/meridian-hills-in linking to this: “Fry’s Electronics opening in Fishers”:http://www.thenoblesvilleledger.com/articles/0/045672-1540-114.html! Cool, I’ve heard lots of geeks out in California and elsewhere talk about buying electronics at Fry’s, but there’s never been one around here. Granted it’ll be a bit up north, but hey, I already drive to CompUSA! Big place they’re moving into (185,000 sq. ft. according to the article), I remember going there when it was the Incredible Universe electronics store (that was a cool place that closed almost before it opened! I think it was overpriced but it was years and years ago before I had money so I wouldn’t remember). Cool!

Well, I’m Back!

Filed under: General — David @ 03:23

Not that I really went anywhere. Just spent so much time working, relaxing, and reading new info, that I didn’t really have the time or inclination to process and organize the info enough to make it pop up here. So I appeared to have dissappeared, except to those I know in real life who saw me a few times :-)

I seem to have a knack for finding interesting (by my definition!) stuff that’s about the actual interesting stuff. For example, there’s a great entry at a blog I read called “Procrastinator, know thyself“:http://www.slackermanager.com/slacker_manager/2005/02/procrastinator_.html that has good insight, but links to another entry in another blog, called “Is Procrastination a Gift?“:http://monster.typepad.com/monsterblog/2005/02/is_procrastinat.html that, in turn, links to “an article in The Wall Street Journal”:http://online.wsj.com/article_email/0,,SB110790238799549268-IdjgINilal4npyrZYKHcaaHm5,00.html. The annoying thing? Reading the first, short article can lead to five minutes worth of reading! And that’s just following one link per page. See why I don’t have time to compose posts here, considering they take even longer with links like that? Not to mention it explains why I end up with, um, (let me count), nine browser windows open simultaneously, With a total of seventy-nine “tabs”:http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/tabbed-browsing.html open at once across those nine “Firefox”:http://www.getfirefox.com/ browser windows! Including this post composition window, of course. I mean, I’m only using five tabs right now, in this browser window, to compose this post. Oops, I just went up to nine, finding some “good”:http://www.gmailforums.com/lofiversion/index.php/t1475.html “pages”:http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20050114201044946 “tabbed”:http://channels.lockergnome.com/web/archives/20041222_italicise_your_unread_firefox_tabs_and_other_bits.phtml browsing…even after closing the Google window I used to search for them :-)

I could probably come up with some other stuff to talk about (this is where I was going to say, “but it will have to wait until later” until I finished the rest of the paragraph!). For example, a friend suggested some good books to grab, namely those by “Michael Crichton”:http://www.crichton-official.com/ (also see “Wikipedia entry”:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Crichton), specifically “The Great Train Robbery“:http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0060502304/davidsworldva-20/002-2086300-3510456?%5Fencoding=UTF8&camp=2025&link%5Fcode=xm2 (also see the “DVD”:http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0792839064/davidsworldva-20/002-2086300-3510456?%5Fencoding=UTF8&camp=2025&link%5Fcode=xm2) and “Andromeda Strain“:http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0060541814/davidsworldva-20/002-2086300-3510456?%5Fencoding=UTF8&camp=2025&link%5Fcode=xm2 (also a movie in “DVD”:http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00008438U/davidsworldva-20/002-2086300-3510456?%5Fencoding=UTF8&camp=2025&link%5Fcode=xm2). Of course while looking those up at “Amazon.com”:http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=davidsworldva-20&path=http://www.amazon.com I saw that they are now playing the trailer for the movie “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy”:http://www.hitchhikersmovie.com/ (see “the Amazon page for it”:http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=davidsworldva-20&path=tg/feature/-/556590/, too) coming the end of April, so I had to watch that and research it a bit. Took me up to 14 browser tabs. Actually, a bit more when I started looking up Michael Crichton books at the library to put on hold :-) And my point at the beginning of this paragraph, was that this post has mainly been me procrastinating to avoid entering the bills I just wrote checks for into “Quicken”:http://www.quicken.com/ and look, I’ve managed to spend a bit more time not doing that :-) Better go now…this post was supposed to be around three sentences long!

Oh yeah…camera is working out great, I love it! More on that some other time :-)

Theory of Relativity Explained with Short Words

Filed under: Entertainment,Funny,General,Science — David @ 02:11

Yep, I took the name of this post from the blog I read it at. Some nut case put this odd item on the ‘net. This post is in the same vein. Read it to find out more. It is very hard to talk this way for very long. I did not read the full post. It was too long, I may try on the next day in time to read it all, but I may not have time at all, when all is said and done. It does seem a bit dumb :-) I am not very good at this! I used a site that will tell me a word that can mean the same as some word that is not the same :-)

Tue, 2005-02-08 (Feb 08)

Considering Cameras (part Yipee! I mean…two)

Filed under: Blog,Digital Cameras,General,Tech (General) — David @ 00:51

(There’s also a “Part One”:http://www.existdifferently.com/archives/2005/02/05/considering-cameras-part-1/ to this post.)

See, “AbesOfMaine”:http://www.abesofmaine.com/ dropped their price on the “Fuji FinePix E550”:http://www.fujifilm.com/JSP/fuji/epartners/digitalE550Overview.jsp?item=I789908&dbid=789908&urltype=overview&NavBarId=I789908 to about $273 plus shipping. Overnight shipping would have been about $35 or so, ground would have been $20. CircuitCity.com was having a deal, web-only, “$314.99”:http://www.circuitcity.com/ssm/Fujifilm-FinePix-E550-Digital-Camera/sem/rpsm/oid/108877/rpem/ccd/productDetail.do but you could pick it up in-store. The store had it on the shelf for $349.99, but since I ordered online I paid $333.90 including tax. It was a tad more for same day-service, but not that much. And I put off the 512MB xD Picture Card until tomorrow because “eCost”:http://www.ecost.com/ was $25 cheaper even with (overnight) shipping! Hey, the included 16MB card holds a whole two pictures. But that’s at the highest quality; it holds like eleven or twelve medium-quality pics! I think the included rechargable hi-capacity AA batteries with charger is a much better included accessory, but I will have to get some more of these rechargables. At least it only uses two at a time instead my old one’s four.

It might be a dissected fetal pig for lunch...(click for full, 4MB version)What? You didn’t think I was going to go through all that and not give you a sample? Well…okay. I was dissecting a fetal pig for a snack earlier and grabbed this one (click picture for full version but be warned, it’s a 4MB file!). If you ask nicely, I might resize it down a bit (the thumbnail doesn’t show the whole picture), ’cause if you’re on dial-up you may want to just say no to 4MB!

Oh yeah, and I’m taking the afternoons off work all this week. If you know me, you might know the past weekend (Catalyst Vision Banquet) as being a bit long. Gotta have some recovery time sometimes. Photography takes time, after all… ;-)

(more…)

Sat, 2005-02-05 (Feb 05)

Considering Cameras (part 1)

Filed under: Blog,Digital Cameras,General,Photography,Tech (General) — David @ 05:09

I’ve been wanting a new digital camera for a while. My current, an Olympus D-450 Zoom, functions excruciatingly slowly, and only has 1.3 megapixels of resolution. It was top of the line for a consumer camera when I got it five or six years ago, and I’ve taken thousands of pictures with it (over a thousand in Holland alone last year). But it’s now old enough that it’s available on “eBay”:http://www.ebay.com/ for $50 or less.

I’m by no means a professional photographer, or even in the “amateur” category really. I don’t have time to develop those skills. But I like to pretend like I know what I’m doing, and maybe learn something when I have time. It’s an area of interest.

So, I want a camera that rocks, at a cheap price. Yeah, who doesn’t? :-) Well, my style tends to be, “develop composition mentally over a wide subject angle, test composition through camera (mainly LCD but occasionally viewfinder), shoot quickly before subject moves.” I take lots of pictures, fast. I don’t wait for the “perfect shot”, if needed I’ll take several in a row of the same thing to see which comes out best (quality-wise and in composition).

This style really seems to fit a point-and-shoot camera better than an SLR-like (or SLR, if that were in my price range). But I want the flexibility of as many manual controls as possible in case I want to do something a little more advanced, and have the time to set it up.

Also, because of my quick-composition and multi-pictures tendencies, I like to take some wide-angle shots in addition to closeups of the same thing, making a long and fast zoom very helpful.

I’m looking at three cameras, when I can afford one. I’ve been eyeing the “Fuji FinePix E550 Zoom”:http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/E550/E55A.HTM for the longest. Earlier tonight I found three others that do that thing I hate — turning an easy decision into a much more subjective and time-consuming one! One is the “Olympus C-7000 Zoom”:http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/C7000/C7KA.HTM, another is the “Casio EXILIM PRO EX-P600”:http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/P600/P60A.HTM, and the final one is the “Canon Powershot S70”:http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/CS70/S70A.HTM. All those links are to reviews at a very awesome site, “Image-Resource.com”:http://www.imaging-resource.com. Another good site with lots of info and in-depth reviews is “Digital Photography Review”:http://www.dpreview.com/, which has info on most, if not all, of the same cameras I just mentioned.

Anyway, I’m going to go through each camera and give some highlights on why I like each. Then I’m going to go to sleep. And later, at a yet-to-be-determined time post more as part 2 of this post.

  • “Fuji FinePix E550 Zoom”:http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/E550/E55A.HTM
    This camera is awesome (second “review at DPreview.com”:http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilme550/ also available). It has nearly everything, the biggest downside is that it only has a 4x zoom, as opposed to the Olympus’s 5x. I don’t mind that it’s a 6.3 megapixel resolution (Olympus and Canon models have seven), six is plenty. A camera with five megapixels I might consider if everything else was awesome enough, but four or lower is a hard sell. It goes from point-and-shoot to full manual control, with lots of options. DPreview says that timing-wise, this thing goes from off to ready-to-shoot in 1.5 seconds, zooms from widest to maximum in 1.5 seconds, and takes a picture about 0.6 seconds after pressing the shutter release fully! That’s a speedy digital camera! All very suitable to my shooting style. Without the flash on, it’s also ready to take a second shot 1.5 seconds after the last, also excellent. My current camera takes 4-6 seconds to be ready for another, and it feels like an eternity most of the time, and it’s pretty bad in the other timing areas, too. But all these cameras here are faster than my existing one, so let’s go on. Oh yeah, it uses the xD Picture Card storage format: more expensive than most but not killer. Two other plusses include interpolated (before compression) pictures up to 12 megapixels from the 6.3 MP sensor, and (according to DPreview) “excellent color and exposure.” It’s also the cheapest of them all! Around $300; unfortunately a Fuji rebate of $50 just expired the end of January :-(
  • “Olympus C-7000 Zoom”:http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/C7000/C7KA.HTM
    I’m equally balanced between the Fuji and this Olympus right now (this one has “a review at DPreview.com”:http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympusc7000/ as well). For one, my current camera is an Olympus. Actually, that’s a downside :-) But DPreview says it goes from off to ready-to-shoot in 1.4 seconds, a full-shutter-release-press (in one motion) takes a picture in 0.5 seconds, and runs 1.7 seconds shot-to-shot. All of which are just barely on either side of the times for the Fuji E550. But, this thing is a seven megapixel camera. Downsides include low battery life (still sky-high compared to my current one!) and a two-second delay before showing the next picture when browsing through existing shots in-camera. The others here are supposed to be much faster than two seconds to pull up a preview. Note again, that in comparison my current Olympus D-450 Zoom can take 4-6 seconds to display a preview of a picture in the camera, which is again an eternity, especially when trying to “scroll” through the shots! Nicest thing about this one over the Fuji (I think) is that the zoom is 5x optical vs. 4x. It has a fast zoom, extending at startup in one second (not sure on speed while zooming but I would assume it’s equally impressive). Media is xD Picture Card.
  • “Casio EXILIM PRO EX-P600”:http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/P600/P60A.HTM
    This one isn’t directly reviewed at DPreview, but the next model up, the EX-P700 (substituting seven megapixels for this one’s six) has a “review at DPreview”:http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/casioexp700/ instead. The EX-P600 is about $80 cheaper than the EX-P700, and some of my info here is from the DPreview info on the EX-P700 instead of the 600. First of all, the timing appears to be very close to the above cameras, except it takes an extra second to turn on and be ready-to-shoot. Like the others (Except the Canon at 1.8″), it’s got a 2.0″ LCD display in addition to the viewfinder. I didn’t see the zoom speed mentioned, but shot-to-shot times were 2 to 2.5 seconds, a bit high. It’s got a 4x optical zoom, the minimum of these cameras. I haven’t gotten in-depth into this camera yet but it looks like a good backup option. Uses SD storage, just like my Treo 600!
  • “Canon Powershot S70”:http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/CS70/S70A.HTM
    Also has a “review at DPreview”:http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canons70/ and it’s a seven megapixel model, like the Olympus C-7000. Optical zoom is only 3.6x, a downside. It does have lots of scene presets for different conditions, and looks cool, being the only black one of the bunch. DPreview says the camera is “not a particularly speedy camera” and focusing in low-light can cause a lot of hunting. Picture playback speed also suffers. Almost three seconds from off to ready-to-shoot. Shooting lag time is one second (higher than the others), and zooming full-wide to telephoto takes 1.8 seconds, admittedly not horrible. A good last choice with high resolution but less zoom and speed.

That’s it for my first roundup! I’ll follow up when I get the chance. And when I make the purchse, whenever I happen to save up the money (sooner if I get the Fuji! :-)

Thu, 2005-02-03 (Feb 03)

TiVo? Schmevo.

Filed under: Entertainment,Tech (General) — David @ 01:11

Tivo’s are cool. However, they’re not cool enough for me to spend money on. I’d rather have something better. One of the bloggers I read has an “article posted on Tuesday on the TiVo Home SDK”:http://www.ericburke.com/blog/2005/02/tivo-hme-sdk.html that seems to assume that Tivo’s must get more expandable and customizable because that’s the only way to do things. I don’t know if he’s aware of the alternatives or not. But if he isn’t, I let him know! And I liked my post enough to repeat it here:

Ever heard of “SageTV”:http://www.sage.tv? I put together a three-tuner computer system running Sage, I don’t pay TiVo’s monthly fee and I can add computer clients anywhere in the house that control the same unit with the same shows. I can add hard drive space. I can install extensions (including commercial detection that someone wrote that works reasonably well, and others that let me read RSS feeds, check weather…). And, they just released a Linux version to go along with the Windows version. I’ve never had a TiVo, but I can’t see the benefits over what I have.

They also have a device coming soon like a media center “extender” so you can put your server in a closet and just run this box near the TV to a network jack (maybe wireless? My laptop works fine as an 802.11g SageTV client) and plug it in. Did I mention it has a free TV guide subscription for two weeks in advance?

Apparently, although I didn’t pick it for several reasons, some people also like “BeyondTV”:http://www.snapstream.com for similar functions.

Microsoft even released their Media Center edition thingy as a copycat of all this.

Why do we need TiVo again? Well, maybe for the non-techies that don’t want the power I just mentioned…but isn’t that who these new TiVo features are geared towards?

Anyway, big Friday night church event this week, I’ll be setting up lighting/media stuff all day tomorrow (Thursday) and then I get a break Friday until about 4:30 pm. But by “all day tomorrow” I mean from 9 am to about 9 pm or so. All for a good cause! I’ll be glad when it’s over though. At least I’m off Saturday…I’ll need it, since it will probably take until 2 am Friday night to strike (that means “take everything down and clean up” in roadie-speak in case you didn’t know :-)

Mon, 2005-01-24 (Jan 24)

Hey, look, I’m up!

Filed under: Blog,General — David @ 07:10

Yep, that’s right! I’m actually awake! Ready to go out the door in fact. Got to go right now, being picked up. Got up at 6:15 though!

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress